Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
1st 1st 3rd
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain Jeff Holek
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Developing quickly with lots of capital and community presence
  • + Positioned well in the Entertainment Space as the market leader
  • + Development focus is for large commercial adoption
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Strong, professional backing of contributors
  • + Clear Use Case
  • + Wide Adoption in Finance
  • + Focused service offering that makes it easy to use
Cons
  • - Still a while before large scale viability
  • - Controversey with copying Ethereum's platform
  • - Not targeted for Private Enterprise use
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  • - Speculators can have impact on the cryptocurrency side of the project
  • - Recent controversy with SEC (link in popup)
  • - Early ledger entries are missing
  Content  
  •  
Overview
The Tron Protocol aims to host entertainment applications and digital content on a decentralized platform fuelled by the TRX token economy. Developed originally on the Ethereum protocol, Tron has invested significant development effort to create their own, scalable protocol and launch their main net in June 2018.
Modular blockchain platform architecture allowing plug-and-play implementations of various functions. Hosts any mainstream language for smart contract development.
One of the first commercially viable Finance focused blockchain solutions. Uses 3 core products (xCurrent, xRapid, xVia) in order to facilitate cross border transactions, liquitiy, and payment processing
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Tron (TRX)
None
Ripple (XRP)
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
No
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
no data
0.93
0.33
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large in house team
Large
Moderate
  •  
Support Team / Community
Modearte. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub. Active telegram group.
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
Moderate
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
Moderate
200+
Large
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Moderate
Quarterly
Quarterly
  •  
Future Planned Work
Great Voyage 2020-2021: focus on ICO capabilities, dividend payments, managing supporters and measuring income.
V1.2
Cobalt Algorithm
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
TRON ICO: August 2017
TRON testnet: March 2018
TRON mainnet: June 2018
First release: July 2017


Initially released in 2012. Whitepaper released in 2017 with commercial applications
  •  
Governance
TRON Foundation. TRON Super Representatives upon main net launch
Linux Foundation - Hyperledger Project Contributors
Ripple Labs
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Not enterprise focused, but has the capabilities to support adoption
Strong Focus
Strong focus, as their core product offerings cater to global banking solutions.
  •  
Production Ready
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Website link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Public Blockchain with security features built in.

Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.

Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability

Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
Membership Service Provider - pluggable interface that supports customizable credential architectures and certificate authorities

Concrete identity format
User credential validation
User credential revocation
Signature generation and verification
Transactions are confirmed and validated through validator nodes.
  •  
Permissions

Permissionless
Consortium

Permissioned, private network.
Permissioned
  •  
Privacy
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
Private Channels
Transaction information on the ledger is public, but payment information is not.
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Fast Paxos PoS variant.

The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
Multiple options:

Pluggable Framework
No-op (no consensus)
PBFT
Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm

70+ validators
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Moderate
Varies
Fast
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
Fast
Varies
TBD
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
Open Source
Open source with proprietary applications
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
Permissioned Network, Public Architecture
  •  
Modularity
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Modular Architecture is a core focus of Platform
Yes
  •  
Scalability
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
1000 TPS capacity for now. Developed with scaling in mind. Provides flexibility in size and throughput depending on the implementation.

A Performance and Scalability Workgroup exists within the community to discuss, research, and identify key use cases and metrics for all blockchains.
1500 TPS with potential of tens of thousands through Ripple Payment Channels
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
500 transactions per block
Large
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low - Moderate
Varies
Low
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Varies
Easy
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Moderate
Low-Moderate
Easy
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Yes
Low
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Low
Free
Varies
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
GPL
Apache 2.0
ISC
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Entertainment Industry. Focused on consumer dApps.
Industry Agnostic
Financial Services
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Java, Scala, C++, Python, Go
Golang, Java, NodeJS, Python
C/C++, Java, node.js , Go
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
In Development
Yes
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
no data
0.12
0.04
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Moderate
Large
Large
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
No
Yes
No
  •  
Finance
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Logistics
No
Yes
No
  •  
Health Care
No
Yes
No
  •  
Government
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Agriculture
No
Yes
No
  •  
Entertainment
Yes
Yes
No
  •  
Automotive
No
Yes
No

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • The Linux Foundation
  • The Linux Foundation
  • Ripple
  •  
  • 1 st
  • 1 st
  • 3 rd
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR