Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
1st 1st 1st
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Not a blockchain. Uses Distributed Ledger Technology to achieve similar end goals and benefits.
  • + Large Financial Institutional backing
  • + Built specifically for Enterprise use
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Applies the hyperledger fabric to its business focused application
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Strong, professional backing of contributors
Cons
  • - Less use cases than alternatives
  • - Smaller Developer Community (Slower Updates)
  • - Not a lot of developer expertise compared to competition
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  Content  
  •  
Overview
Corda is a distributed ledger platform designed to record, manage and automate legal agreements between business partners. Designed by (and for) the worlds largest financial institutions yet with applications in multiple industries. It offers a unique response to the privacy and scalability challenges facing decentralised applications.
Modular Blockchain Environment using Hyperledger Fabric, delivered via IBM Cloud
Modular blockchain platform architecture allowing plug-and-play implementations of various functions. Hosts any mainstream language for smart contract development.
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
None
None
None
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
0.6
93% (Hyperledger)
0.93
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Moderate
Large
Large
  •  
Support Team / Community
Moderate
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
60+ Companies
Large. Latest: Veridium Labs, Stellar - Generating and Tracking Carbon Credits on the Blockchain
200+
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Frequent
Quarterly
  •  
Future Planned Work
Partnerships for Application Development
Scale into multiple industries
V1.2
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
Corda was released open source in November 2016
IBM unveiled its “Blockchain as a Service” offering in March 2017.
First release: July 2017


  •  
Governance
IBM Proprietary BaaS Platform

Linux Foundation
Linux Foundation - Hyperledger Project Contributors
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Strong Focus
Strong Focus. Major contributor to the Hyperledger Fabric project.
Strong Focus
  •  
Production Ready
Yes
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Data is only shared between parties involved in the transaction, verifiers, and permissioned observers. This allows an extra layer of security from traditional DLT where the data is spread throughout the network.
Similar security models to Hyperledger Fabric, but also incorporates the IBM Cloud Services as an added security layer when using the platform.
Membership Service Provider - pluggable interface that supports customizable credential architectures and certificate authorities

Concrete identity format
User credential validation
User credential revocation
Signature generation and verification
  •  
Permissions
Consortium

Permissioned, private network.
  •  
Privacy
Privacy concerns are addressed through the pluggable uniqueness services, and restriction of viewing transactions.
Private channels
Private Channels
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Notaries - Pluggable Framework, Validity consensus and Uniqueness consensus
Plugable consensus (PBFT)
Multiple options:

Pluggable Framework
No-op (no consensus)
PBFT
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Fast
Varies
Varies
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
Varies
Varies
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Hyperledger Fabric is open source. IBM Blockchain is a proprietary layer that sits on top of Hyperledger as a simple to use platform accessing the blockchain
Open Source
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Not a blockchain. Uses DLT to create transaction efficiencies between permissioned parties rather than the same ledger for the entire network, which R3 Corda believes is inefficient.
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
  •  
Modularity
Less focus on modularity
Plug + Play Architecture

Easy to operate software platform to build out use case, test, and implement
Modular Architecture is a core focus of Platform
  •  
Scalability
Corda focuses on scaling through reducing inefficiencies in consensus mechanisms. By limiting involvement to just the transacting parties, beneficiaries, and verifiers it aims to position itself as more scalable than PoW
Supports 1000 TPS. Designed for high throughput business applications. Scales relative to Hyperledger Fabric new developments.
1000 TPS capacity for now. Developed with scaling in mind. Provides flexibility in size and throughput depending on the implementation.

A Performance and Scalability Workgroup exists within the community to discuss, research, and identify key use cases and metrics for all blockchains.
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
500 transactions per block
500 transactions per block
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Varies
Low
Varies
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Varies
Easy
Varies
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Moderate
Low
Low-Moderate
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Free
Free starter version, then $1000/month + $1000/month for each peer deployed
Free
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Finance Focus. Has attached interest from government, energy, insurance, healthcare
Cross-industry
Industry Agnostic
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Written in Kotlin
Execution Runtimes (four are currently supported)
JavaScript SDK
Command Line Interface
REST Server
LoopBack Connector
Playground Web User Interface
Yeoman code generator
VSCode and Atom editor plugins
Golang, Java, NodeJS, Python
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
Yes
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
0.13
12% (Hyperledger)
0.12
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Moderate
Large
Large
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
  •  
Finance
  •  
Logistics
  •  
Health Care
  •  
Government
  •  
Agriculture
  •  
Entertainment
  •  
Automotive

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • The Linux Foundation
  • IBM
  • The Linux Foundation
  •  
  • 1 st
  • 1 st
  • 1 st
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR