Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
1st 1st 1st
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Developing quickly with lots of capital and community presence
  • + Positioned well in the Entertainment Space as the market leader
  • + Development focus is for large commercial adoption
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Applies the hyperledger fabric to its business focused application
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Strong, professional backing of contributors
Cons
  • - Still a while before large scale viability
  • - Controversey with copying Ethereum's platform
  • - Not targeted for Private Enterprise use
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  Content  
  •  
Overview
The Tron Protocol aims to host entertainment applications and digital content on a decentralized platform fuelled by the TRX token economy. Developed originally on the Ethereum protocol, Tron has invested significant development effort to create their own, scalable protocol and launch their main net in June 2018.
Modular Blockchain Environment using Hyperledger Fabric, delivered via IBM Cloud
Modular blockchain platform architecture allowing plug-and-play implementations of various functions. Hosts any mainstream language for smart contract development.
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Tron (TRX)
None
None
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
no data
93% (Hyperledger)
0.93
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large in house team
Large
Large
  •  
Support Team / Community
Modearte. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub. Active telegram group.
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
Moderate
Large. Latest: Veridium Labs, Stellar - Generating and Tracking Carbon Credits on the Blockchain
200+
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Moderate
Frequent
Quarterly
  •  
Future Planned Work
Great Voyage 2020-2021: focus on ICO capabilities, dividend payments, managing supporters and measuring income.
Scale into multiple industries
V1.2
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
TRON ICO: August 2017
TRON testnet: March 2018
TRON mainnet: June 2018
IBM unveiled its “Blockchain as a Service” offering in March 2017.
First release: July 2017


  •  
Governance
TRON Foundation. TRON Super Representatives upon main net launch
IBM Proprietary BaaS Platform

Linux Foundation
Linux Foundation - Hyperledger Project Contributors
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Not enterprise focused, but has the capabilities to support adoption
Strong Focus. Major contributor to the Hyperledger Fabric project.
Strong Focus
  •  
Production Ready
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Public Blockchain with security features built in.

Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.

Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability

Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
Similar security models to Hyperledger Fabric, but also incorporates the IBM Cloud Services as an added security layer when using the platform.
Membership Service Provider - pluggable interface that supports customizable credential architectures and certificate authorities

Concrete identity format
User credential validation
User credential revocation
Signature generation and verification
  •  
Permissions

Permissionless
Permissioned
Consortium

Permissioned, private network.
  •  
Privacy
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
Private channels
Private Channels
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Fast Paxos PoS variant.

The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
Plugable consensus (PBFT)
Multiple options:

Pluggable Framework
No-op (no consensus)
PBFT
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Moderate
Varies
Varies
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
Fast
Varies
Varies
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
Hyperledger Fabric is open source. IBM Blockchain is a proprietary layer that sits on top of Hyperledger as a simple to use platform accessing the blockchain
Open Source
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
  •  
Modularity
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Plug + Play Architecture

Easy to operate software platform to build out use case, test, and implement
Modular Architecture is a core focus of Platform
  •  
Scalability
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
Supports 1000 TPS. Designed for high throughput business applications. Scales relative to Hyperledger Fabric new developments.
1000 TPS capacity for now. Developed with scaling in mind. Provides flexibility in size and throughput depending on the implementation.

A Performance and Scalability Workgroup exists within the community to discuss, research, and identify key use cases and metrics for all blockchains.
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
500 transactions per block
500 transactions per block
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low - Moderate
Low
Varies
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Easy
Varies
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Moderate
Low
Low-Moderate
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Low
Free starter version, then $1000/month + $1000/month for each peer deployed
Free
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
GPL
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Entertainment Industry. Focused on consumer dApps.
Cross-industry
Industry Agnostic
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Java, Scala, C++, Python, Go
Execution Runtimes (four are currently supported)
JavaScript SDK
Command Line Interface
REST Server
LoopBack Connector
Playground Web User Interface
Yeoman code generator
VSCode and Atom editor plugins
Golang, Java, NodeJS, Python
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
In Development
Yes
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
no data
12% (Hyperledger)
0.12
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Moderate
Large
Large
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Finance
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Logistics
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Health Care
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Government
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Agriculture
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Entertainment
Yes
Yes
Yes
  •  
Automotive
No
Yes
Yes

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • The Linux Foundation
  • IBM
  • The Linux Foundation
  •  
  • 1 st
  • 1 st
  • 1 st
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR