Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
1st 5th 4th
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain Michael Gord
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Strong, professional backing of contributors
  • + Large development community
  • + Quick to develop applications on
  • + Wide array of use cases
  • + Not a blockchain. Uses Distributed Ledger Technology to achieve similar end goals and benefits.
  • + Large Financial Institutional backing
  • + Built specifically for Enterprise use
Cons
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  • - Public blockchain creates security concerns
  • - Uses cryptocurrency as fuel for transactions
  • - Forks can cause complications
  • - Less use cases than alternatives
  • - Smaller Developer Community (Slower Updates)
  • - Not a lot of developer expertise compared to competition
  Content  
  •  
Overview
Modular blockchain platform architecture allowing plug-and-play implementations of various functions. Hosts any mainstream language for smart contract development.
Generic, open-source,  blockchain based distributed computing platform for applications to be built upon.
Corda is a distributed ledger platform designed to record, manage and automate legal agreements between business partners. Designed by (and for) the worlds largest financial institutions yet with applications in multiple industries. It offers a unique response to the privacy and scalability challenges facing decentralised applications.
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
None
Ether (ETH)
None
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
0.93
0.93
0.6
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large
Large
Moderate
  •  
Support Team / Community
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
Large
Moderate
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
200+
EEA - 150+ companies
60+ Companies
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Quarterly
High
  •  
Future Planned Work
V1.2
Partnerships for Application Development
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
First release: July 2017


Live first in July 2015 (first public blockchain)

First stable release March 2016
Corda was released open source in November 2016
  •  
Governance
Linux Foundation - Hyperledger Project Contributors
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Strong Focus
Moderate Focus. Through forks, Quorum and Enterprise Ethereum Alliance
Strong Focus
  •  
Production Ready
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Membership Service Provider - pluggable interface that supports customizable credential architectures and certificate authorities

Concrete identity format
User credential validation
User credential revocation
Signature generation and verification
No data encryption or channel partition and is public.

Merkle Patricia Trie Data structure
Data is only shared between parties involved in the transaction, verifiers, and permissioned observers. This allows an extra layer of security from traditional DLT where the data is spread throughout the network.
  •  
Permissions
Consortium

Permissioned, private network.
Permissionless
  •  
Privacy
Private Channels
Limited (zk-SNARKs, Ring signatures)
Privacy concerns are addressed through the pluggable uniqueness services, and restriction of viewing transactions.
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Multiple options:

Pluggable Framework
No-op (no consensus)
PBFT
PoW & PoS
Notaries - Pluggable Framework, Validity consensus and Uniqueness consensus
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Varies
Moderate
Fast
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
Varies
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open Source
Open Source
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
Public with Private Forks
Not a blockchain. Uses DLT to create transaction efficiencies between permissioned parties rather than the same ledger for the entire network, which R3 Corda believes is inefficient.
  •  
Modularity
Modular Architecture is a core focus of Platform
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Less focus on modularity
  •  
Scalability
1000 TPS capacity for now. Developed with scaling in mind. Provides flexibility in size and throughput depending on the implementation.

A Performance and Scalability Workgroup exists within the community to discuss, research, and identify key use cases and metrics for all blockchains.
limited by PoW

currently supports a maximum of 15 TPS
Corda focuses on scaling through reducing inefficiencies in consensus mechanisms. By limiting involvement to just the transacting parties, beneficiaries, and verifiers it aims to position itself as more scalable than PoW
  •  
Storage Capacity
500 transactions per block
Varies
Varies
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Varies
Low
Varies
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Varies
Hard
Varies
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Low-Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Free
Low
Free
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
Apache 2.0
Varous licenses for different parts of code
Apache 2.0
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Industry Agnostic
Cross-industry
Finance Focus. Has attached interest from government, energy, insurance, healthcare
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Golang, Java, NodeJS, Python
Golang, C++, Rust, Python, Solidity
Written in Kotlin
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
0.12
0.52
0.13
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Large
Large
Moderate
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
  •  
Finance
  •  
Logistics
  •  
Health Care
  •  
Government
  •  
Agriculture
  •  
Entertainment
  •  
Automotive

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • The Linux Foundation
  • Ethereum Foundation
  • R3
  •  
  • 1 st
  • 5 th
  • 4 th
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR