Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
1st 6th 1st
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Large development community
  • + Quick to develop applications on
  • + Wide array of use cases
  • + Developing quickly with lots of capital and community presence
  • + Positioned well in the Entertainment Space as the market leader
  • + Development focus is for large commercial adoption
  • + Can support effective private networks
  • + Built for enterprise implementations
  • + Strong, professional backing of contributors
Cons
  • - Public blockchain creates security concerns
  • - Uses cryptocurrency as fuel for transactions
  • - Forks can cause complications
  • - Still a while before large scale viability
  • - Controversey with copying Ethereum's platform
  • - Not targeted for Private Enterprise use
  • - Only centralized aspect is the Certificate Authority (CA) who issues certificates to eligible parties
  • - Support dependent on IBM’s help centre
  • - Still relatively young in development
  Content  
  •  
Overview
Generic, open-source,  blockchain based distributed computing platform for applications to be built upon.
The Tron Protocol aims to host entertainment applications and digital content on a decentralized platform fuelled by the TRX token economy. Developed originally on the Ethereum protocol, Tron has invested significant development effort to create their own, scalable protocol and launch their main net in June 2018.
Modular blockchain platform architecture allowing plug-and-play implementations of various functions. Hosts any mainstream language for smart contract development.
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Ether (ETH)
Tron (TRX)
None
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
0.93
no data
0.93
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large
Large in house team
Large
  •  
Support Team / Community
Large
Modearte. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub. Active telegram group.
Large. IBM has a direct support line.
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
EEA - 150+ companies
Moderate
200+
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
High
Moderate
Quarterly
  •  
Future Planned Work
v3.5
Great Voyage 2020-2021: focus on ICO capabilities, dividend payments, managing supporters and measuring income.
V1.2
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
Live first in July 2015 (first public blockchain)

First stable release March 2016
TRON ICO: August 2017
TRON testnet: March 2018
TRON mainnet: June 2018
First release: July 2017


  •  
Governance
Ethereum Developers
TRON Foundation. TRON Super Representatives upon main net launch
Linux Foundation - Hyperledger Project Contributors
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Moderate Focus. Through forks, Quorum and Enterprise Ethereum Alliance
Not enterprise focused, but has the capabilities to support adoption
Strong Focus
  •  
Production Ready
Yes
No
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
No data encryption or channel partition and is public.

Merkle Patricia Trie Data structure
Public Blockchain with security features built in.

Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.

Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability

Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
Membership Service Provider - pluggable interface that supports customizable credential architectures and certificate authorities

Concrete identity format
User credential validation
User credential revocation
Signature generation and verification
  •  
Permissions
Permissionless

Permissionless
Consortium

Permissioned, private network.
  •  
Privacy
Limited (zk-SNARKs, Ring signatures)
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
Private Channels
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
PoW & PoS
Fast Paxos PoS variant.

The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
Multiple options:

Pluggable Framework
No-op (no consensus)
PBFT
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Moderate
Moderate
Varies
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
~12 blocks
Fast
Varies
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open Source
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
Open Source
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public with Private Forks
Public
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
  •  
Modularity
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Modular Architecture is a core focus of Platform
  •  
Scalability
limited by PoW

currently supports a maximum of 15 TPS
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
1000 TPS capacity for now. Developed with scaling in mind. Provides flexibility in size and throughput depending on the implementation.

A Performance and Scalability Workgroup exists within the community to discuss, research, and identify key use cases and metrics for all blockchains.
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
Varies
500 transactions per block
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low
Low - Moderate
Varies
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Hard
Varies
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Moderate
Moderate
Low-Moderate
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Low
Low
Free
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
Varous licenses for different parts of code
GPL
Apache 2.0
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Cross-industry
Entertainment Industry. Focused on consumer dApps.
Industry Agnostic
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Golang, C++, Rust, Python, Solidity
Java, Scala, C++, Python, Go
Golang, Java, NodeJS, Python
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
Yes
In Development
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
0.52
no data
0.12
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Large
Moderate
Large
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
No
No
Yes
  •  
Finance
No
No
Yes
  •  
Logistics
No
No
Yes
  •  
Health Care
No
No
Yes
  •  
Government
No
No
Yes
  •  
Agriculture
No
No
Yes
  •  
Entertainment
Yes
Yes
Yes
  •  
Automotive
No
No
Yes

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • The Linux Foundation
  • TRON Foundation
  • The Linux Foundation
  •  
  • 1 st
  • 6 th
  • 1 st
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR