Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
4th 4th 3rd
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand Michael Gord
Michael Gord
Jeff Holek
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Developing quickly with lots of capital and community presence
  • + Positioned well in the Entertainment Space as the market leader
  • + Development focus is for large commercial adoption
  • + Not a blockchain. Uses Distributed Ledger Technology to achieve similar end goals and benefits.
  • + Large Financial Institutional backing
  • + Built specifically for Enterprise use
  • + Clear Use Case
  • + Wide Adoption in Finance
  • + Focused service offering that makes it easy to use
Cons
  • - Still a while before large scale viability
  • - Controversey with copying Ethereum's platform
  • - Not targeted for Private Enterprise use
  • - Less use cases than alternatives
  • - Smaller Developer Community (Slower Updates)
  • - Not a lot of developer expertise compared to competition
  • - Speculators can have impact on the cryptocurrency side of the project
  • - Recent controversy with SEC (link in popup)
  • - Early ledger entries are missing
  Content  
  •  
Overview
The Tron Protocol aims to host entertainment applications and digital content on a decentralized platform fuelled by the TRX token economy. Developed originally on the Ethereum protocol, Tron has invested significant development effort to create their own, scalable protocol and launch their main net in June 2018.
Corda is a distributed ledger platform designed to record, manage and automate legal agreements between business partners. Designed by (and for) the worlds largest financial institutions yet with applications in multiple industries. It offers a unique response to the privacy and scalability challenges facing decentralised applications.
One of the first commercially viable Finance focused blockchain solutions. Uses 3 core products (xCurrent, xRapid, xVia) in order to facilitate cross border transactions, liquitiy, and payment processing
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
None
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
0.6
0.33
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large in house team
Moderate
Moderate
  •  
Support Team / Community
Modearte. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub. Active telegram group.
Moderate
Moderate
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
Moderate
60+ Companies
Large
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Moderate
Quarterly
  •  
Future Planned Work
Great Voyage 2020-2021: focus on ICO capabilities, dividend payments, managing supporters and measuring income.
Partnerships for Application Development
Cobalt Algorithm
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
TRON ICO: August 2017
TRON testnet: March 2018
TRON mainnet: June 2018
Corda was released open source in November 2016
Initially released in 2012. Whitepaper released in 2017 with commercial applications
  •  
Governance
TRON Foundation. TRON Super Representatives upon main net launch
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Not enterprise focused, but has the capabilities to support adoption
Strong Focus
Strong focus, as their core product offerings cater to global banking solutions.
  •  
Production Ready
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Website link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Public Blockchain with security features built in.

Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.

Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability

Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
Data is only shared between parties involved in the transaction, verifiers, and permissioned observers. This allows an extra layer of security from traditional DLT where the data is spread throughout the network.
Transactions are confirmed and validated through validator nodes.
  •  
Permissions
Permissioned
  •  
Privacy
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
Privacy concerns are addressed through the pluggable uniqueness services, and restriction of viewing transactions.
Transaction information on the ledger is public, but payment information is not.
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Fast Paxos PoS variant.

The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
Notaries - Pluggable Framework, Validity consensus and Uniqueness consensus
Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm

70+ validators
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Fast
Fast
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
Open source with proprietary applications
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public
Not a blockchain. Uses DLT to create transaction efficiencies between permissioned parties rather than the same ledger for the entire network, which R3 Corda believes is inefficient.
Permissioned Network, Public Architecture
  •  
Modularity
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Less focus on modularity
Yes
  •  
Scalability
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
Corda focuses on scaling through reducing inefficiencies in consensus mechanisms. By limiting involvement to just the transacting parties, beneficiaries, and verifiers it aims to position itself as more scalable than PoW
1500 TPS with potential of tens of thousands through Ripple Payment Channels
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
Varies
Large
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low - Moderate
Varies
Low
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Varies
Easy
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Moderate
Moderate
Easy
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Yes
Low
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Low
Free
Varies
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
GPL
Apache 2.0
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Entertainment Industry. Focused on consumer dApps.
Finance Focus. Has attached interest from government, energy, insurance, healthcare
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Java, Scala, C++, Python, Go
Written in Kotlin
C/C++, Java, node.js , Go
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
Yes
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
0.13
0.04
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Moderate
Moderate
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
  •  
Finance
  •  
Logistics
  •  
Health Care
  •  
Government
  •  
Agriculture
  •  
Entertainment
  •  
Automotive

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • R3
  • R3
  • Ripple
  •  
  • 4 th
  • 4 th
  • 3 rd
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR