Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
4th 2nd 1st
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Developing quickly with lots of capital and community presence
  • + Positioned well in the Entertainment Space as the market leader
  • + Development focus is for large commercial adoption
  • + Highest number of existing Enterprise use cases than other platforms
  • + Supports IoT and hardware to expand solution set
  • + Significant high profile support
  • + Modular Focus (customized transaction rules, consensus algorithms, permissioning)
  • + Part of the Hyperledger Ecosystem
  • + Harnesses IoT technology to provide additional data
Cons
  • - Still a while before large scale viability
  • - Controversey with copying Ethereum's platform
  • - Not targeted for Private Enterprise use
  • - Codebase was just released open-source
  • - Still risky as main net is just releasing
  • - Two coin ecosystem and consensus algorithm still a risk as it is untested long-term.
  • - Open source codebase
  • - Very young in development
  • - Still requires many bug fixes
  Content  
  •  
Overview
The Tron Protocol aims to host entertainment applications and digital content on a decentralized platform fuelled by the TRX token economy. Developed originally on the Ethereum protocol, Tron has invested significant development effort to create their own, scalable protocol and launch their main net in June 2018.
VeChains vision is to build a trust-free and distributed business ecosystem that enables transparent information flow, high speed value transfer and efficient collaboration.
Modular Blockchain Platform, released by Hyperledger and championed by Intel.

Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Tron (TRX)
VeChain Token (VET) and VeThor Tokens (VTHO)
None
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
Yes
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
no data
N/A
No data
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large in house team
Large
Moderate
  •  
Support Team / Community
Modearte. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub. Active telegram group.
Large
Moderate. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub.
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
Moderate
Large
Moderate
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
Moderate
Frequent
High
  •  
Future Planned Work
Great Voyage 2020-2021: focus on ICO capabilities, dividend payments, managing supporters and measuring income.
Main Net Rollout
Bug Fixes
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
TRON ICO: August 2017
TRON testnet: March 2018
TRON mainnet: June 2018
Token First Available: 2015
First IoT PoC: 2016
Mainnet: June 30 2018
Sawtooth 1.0 released in Nov 2017
  •  
Governance
TRON Foundation. TRON Super Representatives upon main net launch
VeChain Foundation. Multi tiered involving a Steering Board, Advisory Board and a number of committes comprised by the public, and investors in the network.
Linux Foundation - Hyperledger Project

On-chain Governance
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Not enterprise focused, but has the capabilities to support adoption
Core Focus
Strong Focus
  •  
Production Ready
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
Public Blockchain with security features built in.

Lamport digital signature algorithm. Claims to be resistant to quantum computer attacks.

Customized P2P network with data storage encryption, location transparency, source nontraceability

Merkle Patricia Trie data structure
"Block Security Protocol" (BSP)
SGX / PoET

All transactions are signed by known identities.
  •  
Permissions

Permissionless
Permissioned Aspects
Permissioned, Permissionless depending on application
  •  
Privacy
Based on zero knowledge proof. Hides the send, receipt address and transfer amount.
Yes
Configrable permissions for any node cluster within the network
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
Fast Paxos PoS variant.

The consensus of TRON adopts a three-step strategy.
Proof of Authority
PoET
Dynamic, Pluggable Consensus Algorithms
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Moderate
No data
Fast
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
Fast
Fast
Varies
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open source but goverened by the TRON organization
Open source with proprietary applications
Open Source
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public
Public
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
  •  
Modularity
Similar to Ethereum:
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Yes
Modular Architecture. Incorporates IoT Sensors that can broaden the use case.
  •  
Scalability
Currently supports 15 TPS as it is on the Ethereum platform. Will be able to support up to 1000 TPS once main net launches
50 - 10,000 TPS
1000 TPS. Built to be scalable in the way that consensus algorithms can be changed, applications are separate from the core system, and transactions can occur in parallel.
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
Depends on implementation
Varies
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low - Moderate
Medium
Low
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Easy
Varies
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Moderate
Easy
Easy
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Low
Yes
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Low
Varies
Low-Moderate
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
GPL
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
Apache 2.0
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Entertainment Industry. Focused on consumer dApps.
Cross-industry
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Java, Scala, C++, Python, Go
GoLang, C, Solidity, JavaScript, Java, TypeScript
Python, JavaScript, Go, C++, Java
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
In Development
Yes
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
no data
N/A
No data
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Moderate
Large
Moderate
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Finance
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Logistics
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Health Care
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Government
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Agriculture
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Entertainment
Yes
Yes
No
  •  
Automotive
No
Yes
Yes

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • R3
  • VeChain Foundation
  • The Linux Foundation
  •  
  • 4 th
  • 2 nd
  • 1 st
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR