Blockchain for Enterprise comparison & reviews

Summary
Rank
2nd 1st 3rd
Score
0%
0%
User Reviews
Question?
Not Enabled Not Enabled Not Enabled
Analysis expand by MLG Blockchain by MLG Blockchain Jeff Holek
Select All
Information expand
0%
0%
0%
  • Fully Supported
  • Limitation
  • Not Supported
  • Information Only
Pros
  • + Large development community
  • + Quick to develop applications on
  • + Wide array of use cases
  • + Modular Focus (customized transaction rules, consensus algorithms, permissioning)
  • + Part of the Hyperledger Ecosystem
  • + Harnesses IoT technology to provide additional data
  • + Clear Use Case
  • + Wide Adoption in Finance
  • + Focused service offering that makes it easy to use
Cons
  • - Public blockchain creates security concerns
  • - Uses cryptocurrency as fuel for transactions
  • - Forks can cause complications
  • - Open source codebase
  • - Very young in development
  • - Still requires many bug fixes
  • - Speculators can have impact on the cryptocurrency side of the project
  • - Recent controversy with SEC (link in popup)
  • - Early ledger entries are missing
  Content  
  •  
Overview
Generic, open-source,  blockchain based distributed computing platform for applications to be built upon.
Modular Blockchain Platform, released by Hyperledger and championed by Intel.

One of the first commercially viable Finance focused blockchain solutions. Uses 3 core products (xCurrent, xRapid, xVia) in order to facilitate cross border transactions, liquitiy, and payment processing
Applications expand
0%
0%
0%
  Crypto Assets  
  •  
Cryptocurrency
Ether (ETH)
None
Ripple (XRP)
  Logic  
  •  
Smart Contract Functionality
Yes
Yes
No
Support expand
0%
0%
0%
  Providers  
  •  
% Providers with experience
0.93
No data
0.33
  Community  
  •  
Size of Developer Team
Large
Moderate
Moderate
  •  
Support Team / Community
Large
Moderate. Some developer resources on Wiki and GitHub.
Moderate
  •  
Partnerships / Alliances / Size
EEA - 150+ companies
Moderate
Large
  Updates  
  •  
Frequency of Updates
High
High
Quarterly
  •  
Future Planned Work
v3.5
Bug Fixes
Cobalt Algorithm
Assessment expand
0%
0%
0%
  General  
  •  
Maturity
Live first in July 2015 (first public blockchain)

First stable release March 2016
Sawtooth 1.0 released in Nov 2017
Initially released in 2012. Whitepaper released in 2017 with commercial applications
  •  
Governance
Ethereum Developers
Linux Foundation - Hyperledger Project

On-chain Governance
Ripple Labs
  •  
Enterprise Focus
Moderate Focus. Through forks, Quorum and Enterprise Ethereum Alliance
Strong Focus
Strong focus, as their core product offerings cater to global banking solutions.
  •  
Production Ready
Yes
Yes
Yes
  •  
Website
Link
Link
Website link
Architecture expand
0%
0%
0%
  Security  
  •  
Security model
No data encryption or channel partition and is public.

Merkle Patricia Trie Data structure
SGX / PoET

All transactions are signed by known identities.
Transactions are confirmed and validated through validator nodes.
  •  
Permissions
Permissionless
Permissioned, Permissionless depending on application
Permissioned
  •  
Privacy
Limited (zk-SNARKs, Ring signatures)
Configrable permissions for any node cluster within the network
Transaction information on the ledger is public, but payment information is not.
  Algorithms  
  •  
Consensus
PoW & PoS
PoET
Dynamic, Pluggable Consensus Algorithms
Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm

70+ validators
  Efficiency  
  •  
Transaction Time
Moderate
Fast
Fast
  •  
Block Confirmation Time
~12 blocks
Varies
TBD
  Development  
  •  
Proprietary Codebase
Open Source
Open Source
Open source with proprietary applications
  General  
  •  
Blockchain / DLT type
Public with Private Forks
Federated / Consortium, Permissioned Network
Permissioned Network, Public Architecture
  •  
Modularity
Generic, with DApp and Smart Contract support for wider applications
Modular Architecture. Incorporates IoT Sensors that can broaden the use case.
Yes
  •  
Scalability
limited by PoW

currently supports a maximum of 15 TPS
1000 TPS. Built to be scalable in the way that consensus algorithms can be changed, applications are separate from the core system, and transactions can occur in parallel.
1500 TPS with potential of tens of thousands through Ripple Payment Channels
  •  
Storage Capacity
Varies
Varies
Large
TCO expand
0%
0%
0%
  Utilities  
  •  
Energy Consumption
Low
Low
Low
  Change Management  
  •  
Ease of Integration in Legacy Systems
Hard
Varies
Easy
  •  
Difficulty to Use
Moderate
Easy
Easy
  Maintenance  
  •  
Required ongoing Support
Yes
Yes
Low
  Pricing  
  •  
Cost to Use
Low
Low-Moderate
Varies
Integration expand
0%
0%
0%
  Licensing  
  •  
Licensing
Varous licenses for different parts of code
Apache 2.0
ISC
  industry focus  
  •  
Industry
Cross-industry
Cross-industry
Financial Services
  Developers  
  •  
Development Environment (Languages/SDKs)
Golang, C++, Rust, Python, Solidity
Python, JavaScript, Go, C++, Java
C/C++, Java, node.js , Go
  Third Party Support  
  •  
API Support
Yes
Yes
Yes
Market Presence expand
0%
0%
0%
  Engagements  
  •  
% share of engagements
0.52
No data
0.04
  Uses  
  •  
Number of Use Cases / Implementations
Large
Moderate
Large
  Industry Focus  
  •  
Retail
No
Yes
No
  •  
Finance
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Logistics
No
Yes
No
  •  
Health Care
No
Yes
No
  •  
Government
No
Yes
Yes
  •  
Agriculture
No
Yes
No
  •  
Entertainment
Yes
No
No
  •  
Automotive
No
Yes
No

Matrix Score

  •  
  •  
  • VeChain Foundation
  • The Linux Foundation
  • Ripple
  •  
  • 2 nd
  • 1 st
  • 3 rd
X
Login to access your personal profile

Forgot your Password?
X
Signup with linkedin
X

Registered, but not activated? click here (resend activation link)

Login to access your personal profile

Receive new comparison alerts

Show me as community member

I agree to your Terms of services

GDPR